The following is a blog post I wrote recently about a common law case that has the potential to go all the way to the Supreme Court. The case involved a woman who was charged with shoplifting a bunch of walgreens from an open-air drug store. She was convicted, and now has to pay a fine but can’t leave the state with her job.
The case is U.S. v. Kibler, in which the Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment rights of an accused employee are not limited by the state’s interest in preventing the employee from pursuing a livelihood. In this case, the owner of the store where the employee was arrested, wanted to hire the employee back but was unable to do so because of a federal law that says that employees cannot be forced to work in a state where they are in danger.
The ruling is a direct repudiation of the First Amendment rights of employees. It’s a good law because, in its current form, it’s a good, legal thing.
When I was in school I read something of the legal history of the First Amendment. It was the First Amendment’s first amendment. I don’t know if I have or not, but I read it and I saw that it was the right-to-life clause. The first amendment was one of the first of the right-to-life clauses in the Constitution.
This is a great example because the law is being passed by a democratic state congress and is being voted on by the people. I doubt that it is a good thing for Walgreens, but they really could have just been a small town.
Well, it’s a little bit of a stretch, but yes I’d say Walgreens is a small town. I can’t speak for other stores or even the state of Oklahoma, but I can speak for the general public when I say the First Amendment is being trampled upon by the people.
The reason I say that is because the people are the ones voting on it. The people are the ones who are creating the law, passing it, and making decisions about what the law means. These people are making decisions about what laws mean and what people should be allowed to say. They are making laws, and then this is who they are. The people don’t have to like it.
The question is whether we should be allowed to say what we want. If we dont like it, we should change it. If we are allowed to say what we want, then we have a right to say it.
This is a very interesting idea. Walgreens is the company that makes everything you see on the market. This is why they’re so popular, even when they’re doing something wrong. They’re the very company that makes you think twice about getting a prescription, or the very companies that make you think twice about buying your car from them. This is why I would vote against Walgreens law because it is the company that can make you think twice about buying your medicine or your car.
I would also go on to say that if your doctor makes a mistake, who can you go to if you don’t trust your doctor? Not Walgreens, no. Thats why I would vote against Walgreens law.
0 Comments